Gender Equality Laws In The Post Socialist States Of Central And Eastern Europe: Mainstream Fixture Or Fizzer?

Jivan, VR; Forster, CM

Gender Equality Laws In The Post Socialist States Of Central And Eastern Europe: Mainstream Fixture Or Fizzer?

Jivan, VR

Forster, CM

Permalink

Publisher:: Cambridge University Press
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: European Journal of Law Reform, 2012, 14 (4), pp. 444 - 466
Issue Date:: 2012-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2011000227OK.pdf		1.41 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Jivan, VR https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-6496	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Forster, CM	en_US
dc.date.issued	2012-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	European Journal of Law Reform, 2012, 14 (4), pp. 444 - 466	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1387-2370	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22720
dc.description.abstract	In Central and Eastern European countries, the enactment of gender equality laws defined as stand-alone national legislation that provide an overarching legislative response to gender discrimination as distinct from the traditional approach of incorporating gender equality provisions into existing legislation or constitutions, has been a marked regional trend since the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, rather than being driven by domestic movements for change, gender equality laws seem primarily to have emerged due to pressure from development agencies, potential trading partners and donor organisations which predicate their assistance and business on the establishment of the 'rule of law' and of particular relevance in the region the desire to join the European Union (EU), which requires potential members to introduce gender equality legislation as part of the communtaire aquis. Despite the widespread enactment of GEL in the region, research suggests that the implementation of GEL has been slow, inefficient and in some cases non-existent. Reasons posited for this include a lack of judicial familiarity with new concepts contained in the legislation, the use of legislation taken from models in existing member states, lack of information disseminated about the new laws to relevant parties, weak political support and capacity weakness in states that are resource stretched. This article considers a further reason - the weakness of the enforcement and implementation mechanisms in the laws themselves and argues that despite the placement of expansive positive duties on a range of public and private actors in many of the GEL, the implementation and enforcement mechanisms of the 15 GEL considered are weak. Consequently, despite their remarkable scope the duties created under the GEL are largely symbolic and will continue to be so unless such legislation is amended to include mechanisms to enable the realisation of those duties in practice.	en_US
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	European Journal of Law Reform	en_US
dc.title	Gender Equality Laws In The Post Socialist States Of Central And Eastern Europe: Mainstream Fixture Or Fizzer?	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	14	en_US
utslib.for	1801 Law	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Law
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	4	en_US
pubs.volume	14	en_US

Abstract:

In Central and Eastern European countries, the enactment of gender equality laws defined as stand-alone national legislation that provide an overarching legislative response to gender discrimination as distinct from the traditional approach of incorporating gender equality provisions into existing legislation or constitutions, has been a marked regional trend since the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, rather than being driven by domestic movements for change, gender equality laws seem primarily to have emerged due to pressure from development agencies, potential trading partners and donor organisations which predicate their assistance and business on the establishment of the 'rule of law' and of particular relevance in the region the desire to join the European Union (EU), which requires potential members to introduce gender equality legislation as part of the communtaire aquis. Despite the widespread enactment of GEL in the region, research suggests that the implementation of GEL has been slow, inefficient and in some cases non-existent. Reasons posited for this include a lack of judicial familiarity with new concepts contained in the legislation, the use of legislation taken from models in existing member states, lack of information disseminated about the new laws to relevant parties, weak political support and capacity weakness in states that are resource stretched. This article considers a further reason - the weakness of the enforcement and implementation mechanisms in the laws themselves and argues that despite the placement of expansive positive duties on a range of public and private actors in many of the GEL, the implementation and enforcement mechanisms of the 15 GEL considered are weak. Consequently, despite their remarkable scope the duties created under the GEL are largely symbolic and will continue to be so unless such legislation is amended to include mechanisms to enable the realisation of those duties in practice.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/22720