Agency, Redirected

Finney, TL; Reinmuth, G

Agency, Redirected

Finney, TL

Reinmuth, G

Permalink

Publisher:: The Association of Architecture Schools of Australia
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of The Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia, 2013, pp. 406 - 425
Issue Date:: 2013-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (338.33 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Finney, TL https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-6327	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Reinmuth, G https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0168	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Ramirez-Lovering, D	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Alexander, J	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Fairley, A	en_US
dc.date	2013-10-03	en_US
dc.date.issued	2013-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of The Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia, 2013, pp. 406 - 425	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-1-921994-29-6	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/24028
dc.description.abstract	In response to changes in both the practice of architecture and changes in terms of architectures field of operation: the global economic, political and cultural context of its production, the following paper proposes to re-examine the inherited unit system of the graduate educational M.Arch design studio. Contrary to `alternate modes of practice' that propose in critiquing the profession, an abandonment of the discipline of architecture, this paper instead calls for a clarified return in the educational context to architecture's core material and spatial skill set redirected relative to the animating diagrammatic condition that since the 19th century has relied on architectures capacities in material and organizational experimentation to build cities.	en_US
dc.publisher	The Association of Architecture Schools of Australia	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of The Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia Annual Conference (AASA)	en_US
dc.title	Agency, Redirected	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	Melbourne	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Melbourne, Victoria	en_US
utslib.for	1201 Architecture	en_US
dc.location.activity	Melbourne	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2013-10-05	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Melbourne	en_US
pubs.start-date	2013-10-03	en_US

Abstract:

In response to changes in both the practice of architecture and changes in terms of architectures field of operation: the global economic, political and cultural context of its production, the following paper proposes to re-examine the inherited unit system of the graduate educational M.Arch design studio. Contrary to `alternate modes of practice' that propose in critiquing the profession, an abandonment of the discipline of architecture, this paper instead calls for a clarified return in the educational context to architecture's core material and spatial skill set redirected relative to the animating diagrammatic condition that since the 19th century has relied on architectures capacities in material and organizational experimentation to build cities.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/24028