Education in Undergraduate Construction Management Degrees - Is it "Construction" or "Management" that is in bold type?

Publisher:
IATED
Publication Type:
Conference Proceeding
Citation:
7th International International Technology, Education and Development Conference: Proceedings, 2013, pp. 1563 - 1569
Issue Date:
2013-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2012006867OK.pdf3.43 MB
Adobe PDF
The proposition of this study is that the content of education in construction management degree programs has changed over time. Content has moved away from construction technology and has moved more towards generic areas of management. Here, issues arise such as prescriptive versus principle-base teaching and the degree to which experiential learning can be provided. This study explores quantifiable data to test the above proposition over an extended period of time for a selected University in Australia. The study looks at course handbook data for the construction management degree including the likes of assigned subject credit points and contact hours. From the analysis, debate and related sources of supporting information are used to extrapolate themes demonstrating the resultant changes in graduate profile arising from the analysis. Comment is also provided on the impact of such changes including the differentiation of university graduates in the past and present. The industry perspective is also canvassed in terms of how changes have affected their expectations relating to employment of University qualified graduates.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: