The Morally defensible journalist: Shedding 'performance' and managing an ethic of empathy within personal narrative trauma

Abramis Academic
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Ethical Space, 2013, 10 (4), pp. 8 - 15
Issue Date:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2012007386OK_Joseph.pdf1.09 MB
Adobe PDF
Full metadata record
Janet Malcolm penned the infamous `morally indefensible' phrase more than twenty years ago concerning journalism practice and, despite the length of time, its application is a bench-marking filter through which ethical journalism must still emerge. Drawing on my experience of being interviewed by the media, I examine the performative aspect of profile writing, seeking a model of variant `morally defensible' positions dependent on a public interest test. In seeking to subvert the notion of a popular trauma culture that deems a subject a victim for mass media consumption for no good reason other than entertainment - a `morally indefensible' space - this paper suggests that in an interview focusing on a trauma narrative, when handled ethically and empathetically, both the subject and the journalism practitioner have an opportunity to metaphorically converge. They eventually leave any notion of performance and identity construct behind, as the power of the narrative creates a transparent space. When handled ethically according to the telling by the subject, both the impulse by the trauma subject to tell and the empathetic responses and re-renderings of the journalist join to form a type of advocacy journalism - in the public interest.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: