Performance analysis of full bridge, boost half bridge and half bridge topologies for application in phase shift converters

Jafari, M; Malekjamshidi, Z; Li, L; Zhu, JG

Performance analysis of full bridge, boost half bridge and half bridge topologies for application in phase shift converters

Jafari, M

Malekjamshidi, Z

Li, L

Zhu, JG

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, ICEMS 2013, 2013, pp. 1589 - 1595
Issue Date:: 2013-12-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (439.38 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Jafari, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8521-8636	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Malekjamshidi, Z https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5951-620X	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Li, L https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-2216	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Zhu, JG https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-4047	en_US
dc.date.issued	2013-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, ICEMS 2013, 2013, pp. 1589 - 1595	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781479914470	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/27272
dc.description.abstract	In this paper, performances of three topologies of bidirectional ports applicable to phase shift converters are compared. The proposed topologies include full bridge, half bridge and boost-half bridge that are commonly used as bi-directional port in various topologies of DC converters. The proposed analyses based on several indicators and characteristics of the topologies including reliability factor, switching loss, current ripple, cost, size, efficiency, range of power flow versus phase shift angle and control complexity. A phase shift converter based on proposed topologies was simulated using P-SIM. The analysis shows that considering all effective factors, full bridge topology provides better characteristics compared with others and can be selected for a phase shift converter. Also in some applications other topologies still remain a favorite choice. © 2013 IEEE.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, ICEMS 2013	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/ICEMS.2013.6713326	en_US
dc.title	Performance analysis of full bridge, boost half bridge and half bridge topologies for application in phase shift converters	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering	en_US
dc.location.activity	Busan,Korea	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Electrical and Data Engineering
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCET - Centre for Clean Energy Technology
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

In this paper, performances of three topologies of bidirectional ports applicable to phase shift converters are compared. The proposed topologies include full bridge, half bridge and boost-half bridge that are commonly used as bi-directional port in various topologies of DC converters. The proposed analyses based on several indicators and characteristics of the topologies including reliability factor, switching loss, current ripple, cost, size, efficiency, range of power flow versus phase shift angle and control complexity. A phase shift converter based on proposed topologies was simulated using P-SIM. The analysis shows that considering all effective factors, full bridge topology provides better characteristics compared with others and can be selected for a phase shift converter. Also in some applications other topologies still remain a favorite choice. © 2013 IEEE.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/27272