Age discrimination in turbulent times
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Griffith Law Review, 2010, 19 (2), pp. 141 - 171
- Issue Date:
- 2010-01-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2011006375OK.pdf | 378.48 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2010, Routledge. All rights reserved. Concerns about the ramifications of a rapidly ageing population have generally focused on the post-retirement period, with limited scholarly attention to the experience of ageism in the workplace. Despite a shift in policy against early retirement, ʻolder workersʼ — who may be as young as 40 — are disproportionately experiencing age discrimination, often resulting in joblessness. We argue that in a postmodern environment, where the culture of ʻyouthismʼ predominates, the workplace is undergoing significant changes. In the new knowledge economy, characterised by technological knowhow, flexibility and choice, traditional values such as maturity, experience and loyalty have become passé. Drawing on Australian complaints and reported decisions of age discrimination in the workplace in the context of the international literature, we demonstrate the variety of forms ageism is taking. We argue that age discrimination legislation reflects an outdated modernist paradigm that fails to address the experience of older workers. In addition, as part of the culture of youthism, work is now being gauged by its capacity to create an aesthetic of pleasure.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: