Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC

Buckingham Shum, S; Selvin, AM; Sierhuis, M; Conklin, J; Haley, CB; Nuseibeh, B

Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC

Buckingham Shum, S

Selvin, AM Sierhuis, M Conklin, J Haley, CB Nuseibeh, B

Permalink

Publisher:: Springer-Verlag
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: Rationale Management in Software Engineering, 2006, 1, pp. 111 - 132
Issue Date:: 2006-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2013006526OK.pdf		832.25 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Buckingham Shum, S https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-7429	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Selvin, AM	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Sierhuis, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Conklin, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Haley, CB	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Nuseibeh, B	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Dutoit, A	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	McCall, R	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Mistrik, I	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Paech, B	en_US
dc.date.issued	2006-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Rationale Management in Software Engineering, 2006, 1, pp. 111 - 132	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-3-540-30997-0	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/29372
dc.description.abstract	Having developed, used and evaluated some of the early IBIS-based approaches to design rationale (DR) such as gIBIS and QOC in the late 1980s/mid-1990s, we describe the subsequent evolution of the argumentation-based paradigm through software support, and perspectives drawn from modeling and meeting facilitation. Particular attention is given to the challenge of negotiating the overheads of capturing this form of rationale. Our approach has maintained a strong emphasis on keeping the representational scheme as simple as possible to enable real time meeting mediation and capture, attending explicitly to the skills required to use the approach well, particularly for the sort of participatory, multi-stakeholder requirements analysis demanded by many design problems. However, we can then specialize the notation and the way in which the tool is used in the service of specific methodologies, supported by a customizable hypermedia environment, and interoperable with other software tools. After presenting this approach, called Compendium, we present examples to illustrate the capabilities for support security argumentation in requirements engineering, template driven modeling for document generation, and IBIS-based indexing of and navigation around video records of meetings.	en_US
dc.publisher	Springer-Verlag	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Rationale Management in Software Engineering	en_US
dc.title	Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
utslib.location	Berlin	en_US
utslib.for	0806 Information Systems	en_US
utslib.citation.edition	1	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Teaching and Learning)
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	false	en_US
pubs.edition	1	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Berlin	en_US

Abstract:

Having developed, used and evaluated some of the early IBIS-based approaches to design rationale (DR) such as gIBIS and QOC in the late 1980s/mid-1990s, we describe the subsequent evolution of the argumentation-based paradigm through software support, and perspectives drawn from modeling and meeting facilitation. Particular attention is given to the challenge of negotiating the overheads of capturing this form of rationale. Our approach has maintained a strong emphasis on keeping the representational scheme as simple as possible to enable real time meeting mediation and capture, attending explicitly to the skills required to use the approach well, particularly for the sort of participatory, multi-stakeholder requirements analysis demanded by many design problems. However, we can then specialize the notation and the way in which the tool is used in the service of specific methodologies, supported by a customizable hypermedia environment, and interoperable with other software tools. After presenting this approach, called Compendium, we present examples to illustrate the capabilities for support security argumentation in requirements engineering, template driven modeling for document generation, and IBIS-based indexing of and navigation around video records of meetings.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/29372