Crystallization of agility: Back to basics

Qumer, A; Henderson-Sellers, B

Crystallization of agility: Back to basics

Qumer, A

Henderson-Sellers, B

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: ICSOFT 2006 - 1st International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings, 2006, 2 pp. 121 - 126
Issue Date:: 2006-12-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (542.34 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Qumer, A https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-6280	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.date.issued	2006-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	ICSOFT 2006 - 1st International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings, 2006, 2 pp. 121 - 126	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9728865694	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9789728865696	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/2938
dc.description.abstract	There are a number of agile and traditional methodologies for software development. Agilists provide agile principles and agile values to characterize the agile methods but there is no clear and inclusive definition of agile methods; subsequently it is not feasible to draw a clear distinction between traditional and agile software development methods in practice. The purpose of this paper is to explain the concept of agility in detail; and then to suggest a definition of agile methods that would help in the ranking or differentiation of agile methods from other available methods.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	ICSOFT 2006 - 1st International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings	en_US
dc.title	Crystallization of agility: Back to basics	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.for	080309 Software Engineering	en_US
dc.location.activity	Setubal, Portugal	en_US
dc.location.activity	Montreal, Canada
dc.location.activity	Polytech Inst Setubal, Sch Business, Setubal, PORTUGAL
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Computer Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - GBDTC - Global Big Data Technologies
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	2	en_US

Abstract:

There are a number of agile and traditional methodologies for software development. Agilists provide agile principles and agile values to characterize the agile methods but there is no clear and inclusive definition of agile methods; subsequently it is not feasible to draw a clear distinction between traditional and agile software development methods in practice. The purpose of this paper is to explain the concept of agility in detail; and then to suggest a definition of agile methods that would help in the ranking or differentiation of agile methods from other available methods.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/2938