Designing to support reasoned imagination through embodied metaphor

Antle, AN; Corness, G; Bakker, S; Droumeva, M; Van Den Hoven, E; Bevans, A

Designing to support reasoned imagination through embodied metaphor

Antle, AN Corness, G Bakker, S Droumeva, M Van Den Hoven, E

Bevans, A

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: C and C 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 2009, pp. 275 - 284
Issue Date:: 2009-10-26

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2012000119OK.pdf	Published version	1.16 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Antle, AN	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Corness, G	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bakker, S	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Droumeva, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Van Den Hoven, E https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0888-1426	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bevans, A	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-10-26	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	C and C 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 2009, pp. 275 - 284	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781605584034	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/30680
dc.description.abstract	Copyright 2009 ACM. Supporting users' reasoned imagination in sense making during interaction with tangible and embedded computation involves supporting the application of their existing mental schemata in understanding new forms of interaction. Recent studies that include an embodied metaphor in the interaction model, which relates action-based inputs to digital outputs, have provided evidence that this approach is beneficial. Yet the design of such systems has been difficult and full of setbacks. Wide spread adoption of this approach requires a better understanding of how to design such embodied metaphor-based interactional models. We analyze three recent design-based research studies in which we have been involved in order to derive design knowledge that may inform others. Following a case study methodology we identify kernels or points in the design process where discontinuities between predicted and actual interaction highlight important design knowledge.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	C and C 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1145/1640233.1640275	en_US
dc.title	Designing to support reasoned imagination through embodied metaphor	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	120304 Digital and Interaction Design	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Computer Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Copyright 2009 ACM. Supporting users' reasoned imagination in sense making during interaction with tangible and embedded computation involves supporting the application of their existing mental schemata in understanding new forms of interaction. Recent studies that include an embodied metaphor in the interaction model, which relates action-based inputs to digital outputs, have provided evidence that this approach is beneficial. Yet the design of such systems has been difficult and full of setbacks. Wide spread adoption of this approach requires a better understanding of how to design such embodied metaphor-based interactional models. We analyze three recent design-based research studies in which we have been involved in order to derive design knowledge that may inform others. Following a case study methodology we identify kernels or points in the design process where discontinuities between predicted and actual interaction highlight important design knowledge.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/30680