An Exploratory Study of Software Review in Practice

Wong, Y

An Exploratory Study of Software Review in Practice

Wong, Y

Permalink

Publisher:: The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Inc (IEEE)
Publication Type:: Conference
Citation:: Wong, Y. 2003 'An Exploratory Study of Software Review in Practice', Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Inc (IEEE), Portland, USA, pp. 301-308.
Issue Date:: 2003

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2003001655.pdf		860.41 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wong, Y	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Kocaoglu, D; Anderson, T	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2009-11-09T05:38:40Z
dc.date.available	2009-11-09T05:38:40Z
dc.date.issued	2003	en_US
dc.identifier	2003001655	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Wong, Y. 2003 'An Exploratory Study of Software Review in Practice', Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Inc (IEEE), Portland, USA, pp. 301-308.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1-890843-08-3	en_US
dc.identifier.other	E1	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3090
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this paper is to identify the key software review inputs that significantly affect review performance in practice. Five in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with different I.T. organizations. From the interviews’ results, the typical issues for conducting software review include (1) selecting right reviewers to perform a defect detection task, (2) the limitation of time and resources for organizing and conducting software renew (3) no standard and specific guideline to measure an effective review for different types of software artefacts (i.e. requirement, design, code and test cases). Thus the result shows that the experience (i.e. knowledge and skills) of reviewers is the most significant input influenciug software review performance.	en_US
dc.publisher	The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Inc (IEEE)	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Technology Management for Reshaping the World	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=1222807&isnumber=27466	en_US
dc.rights	© 2003 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.	en_US
dc.title	An Exploratory Study of Software Review in Practice	en_US
dc.type	Conference
utslib.location	USA	en_US
utslib.citation.startpage	301	en_US
utslib.citation.endpage	308	en_US
utslib.identifier.org	School of Computing Sciences	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Portland, USA	en_US
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.declined	1970-01-01T00:00:00.0+1000

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to identify the key software review inputs that significantly affect review performance in practice. Five in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with different I.T. organizations. From the interviews’ results, the typical issues for conducting software review include (1) selecting right reviewers to perform a defect detection task, (2) the limitation of time and resources for organizing and conducting software renew (3) no standard and specific guideline to measure an effective review for different types of software artefacts (i.e. requirement, design, code and test cases). Thus the result shows that the experience (i.e. knowledge and skills) of reviewers is the most significant input influenciug software review performance.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3090