Action Research as Metamethodology: Managing the Complexity of an applied research project
- Publisher:
- European Academy of Management
- Publication Type:
- Conference Proceeding
- Citation:
- EURAM2014, 2014, pp. 1 - 25
- Issue Date:
- 2014-01
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR_metamethodology_final.pdf | Accepted Manuscript version | 477.36 kB | |||
EURAM 2014 paper reviews.docx | Accepted Manuscript version | 34.36 kB | |||
EURAM 2014 Program Extracts.pdf | Published version | 777.08 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
A large applied research study is a challenging exercise in project management, often unpredictable because of its complexity. At the beginning, funding bodies, ethics committees and participating organizations expect a plan of what is intended. As the research evolves, researchers must meet the expectations of stakeholders while being responsive to the emergent reality that the research faces and partly uncovers. This paper describes action research used as an umbrella process - a metamethodology - under which these contrasting demands can be satisfied. In particular, two characteristics enable action research to do so. One is its cyclic process, iteratively tracing out a rhythm of planning, acting, and observing the results. The other is the nesting of its cycles, applied at scales ranging from the overall study to the moment-by-moment facilitation. We illustrate this use of action research with examples from a lengthy applied study of leadership in faith-based not-for-profit organizations.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: