A formal concept view of abstract argumentation

Amgoud, L; Prade, H

A formal concept view of abstract argumentation

Amgoud, L Prade, H

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2013, 7958 LNAI pp. 1 - 12
Issue Date:: 2013-08-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2013007794OK.pdf	Published version	263.14 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Amgoud, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Prade, H https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-8527	en_US
dc.date.issued	2013-08-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2013, 7958 LNAI pp. 1 - 12	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9783642390906	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0302-9743	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32819
dc.description.abstract	The paper presents a parallel between two important theories for the treatment of information which address questions that are apparently unrelated and that are studied by different research communities: an enriched view of formal concept analysis and abstract argumentation. Both theories exploit a binary relation (expressing object-property links, attacks between arguments). We show that when an argumentation framework rather considers the complementary relation does not attack, then its stable extensions can be seen as the exact counterparts of formal concepts. This leads to a cube of oppositions, a generalization of the well-known square of oppositions, between eight remarkable sets of arguments. This provides a richer view for argumentation in cases of bi-valued attack relations and fuzzy ones. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3-1	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Artificial Intelligence & Image Processing	en_US
dc.title	A formal concept view of abstract argumentation	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	7958 LNAI	en_US
utslib.for	0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CAI - Centre for Artificial Intelligence
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	7958 LNAI	en_US

Abstract:

The paper presents a parallel between two important theories for the treatment of information which address questions that are apparently unrelated and that are studied by different research communities: an enriched view of formal concept analysis and abstract argumentation. Both theories exploit a binary relation (expressing object-property links, attacks between arguments). We show that when an argumentation framework rather considers the complementary relation does not attack, then its stable extensions can be seen as the exact counterparts of formal concepts. This leads to a cube of oppositions, a generalization of the well-known square of oppositions, between eight remarkable sets of arguments. This provides a richer view for argumentation in cases of bi-valued attack relations and fuzzy ones. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/32819