Conceal or Reveal? The Role of Law in Black Collar Crime

UTS Epress
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 2007, 1 (1), pp. 1 - 35
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2006010089.pdf521.14 kB
Adobe PDF
This article reconsiders the way in which the State deals with the suppression or concealment of crimes, particularly child sexual abuse, by members of institutions such as churches. There are legal mechanisms available to bring such prosecutions and yet they are not being utilized. This article critically analyses the exemption from prosecution for concealing a serious indictable offence, by members of the clergy under section 316 (4) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW); and that section s relationship to the religious confession privilege under section 217 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). The article deconstructs the three major justifications underpinning the legislative provisions. These justifications overlap, but can be isolated under the following headings: history, freedom of religion, and spiritual considerations. I argue that interpretation of section 316 (4) of the Crimes Act 1900 should, at a minimum, be confined to the scope of the religious confession privilege in section 217 of the Evidence Act 1995. Further, I argue that the justifications underpinning the legislative scheme and the assumptions they are based on are untenable in a secular society.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: