Framing and dominant metaphors in the coverage of North Korea in the Australian media

Dalton, B; Jung, K; Willis, J; Bell, M

Framing and dominant metaphors in the coverage of North Korea in the Australian media

Dalton, B

Jung, K

Willis, J

Bell, M

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Pacific Review, 2016, 29 (4), pp. 523 - 547
Issue Date:: 2016-08-07

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Metaphors North Korea Dalton Jung Willis and Bell Pacific Review 2015.pdf	Published Version	615.61 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Dalton, B https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-1447	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Jung, K https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-7712	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Willis, J https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-8479	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bell, M	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-08-07	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Pacific Review, 2016, 29 (4), pp. 523 - 547	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0951-2748	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/34713
dc.description.abstract	© 2015 Taylor & Francis. Through the selective allocation of attention, framing and metaphors in covering foreign affairs and countries, media narratives often act to delegitimise, marginalise and demonise international actors. Focusing on Australian reportage of North Korea in The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald and from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012, this paper explicates how the framing mechanisms utilised in media point to media complicity in reinforcing a negative, adversarial orientation towards North Korea. It also discusses implications for how Australians view the North Korean people, Australian–North Korean relations, and policy pertaining to Northeast Asia more broadly.	en_US
dc.relation	http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP130101700
dc.relation.ispartof	Pacific Review	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1080/09512748.2015.1022588	en_US
dc.subject.classification	International Relations	en_US
dc.title	Framing and dominant metaphors in the coverage of North Korea in the Australian media	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	29	en_US
utslib.for	1605 Policy and Administration	en_US
utslib.for	1606 Political Science	en_US
utslib.for	2001 Communication and Media Studies	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/Social and Political Sciences Program
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	4	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	29	en_US

Abstract:

© 2015 Taylor & Francis. Through the selective allocation of attention, framing and metaphors in covering foreign affairs and countries, media narratives often act to delegitimise, marginalise and demonise international actors. Focusing on Australian reportage of North Korea in The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald and from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012, this paper explicates how the framing mechanisms utilised in media point to media complicity in reinforcing a negative, adversarial orientation towards North Korea. It also discusses implications for how Australians view the North Korean people, Australian–North Korean relations, and policy pertaining to Northeast Asia more broadly.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/34713