Philosophical and logic-based argumentation-driven reasoning approaches and their realization on the WWW: A survey

Janjua, NK; Hussain, OK; Hussain, FK; Chang, E

Philosophical and logic-based argumentation-driven reasoning approaches and their realization on the WWW: A survey

Janjua, NK Hussain, OK Hussain, FK

Chang, E

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Computer Journal, 2014, 58 (9), pp. 1967 - 1999
Issue Date:: 2014-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	The Computer Journal-2014-Janjua-comjnl_bxu057.pdf	Published Version	832.2 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Janjua, NK	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Hussain, OK	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Hussain, FK https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-8072	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Chang, E	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Computer Journal, 2014, 58 (9), pp. 1967 - 1999	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0010-4620	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/34725
dc.description.abstract	© 2014 The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. Argumentation is the practice of systematic conscious reasoning involving the construction and evaluation of arguments to justify or support a particular conclusion. This article discusses, compares, contrasts and categorizes existing argumentation-based frameworks and applications as either philosophical or logic-based, and provides critical analysis that emphasizes the structure of arguments and the interactions between them. This review compares and contrasts the frameworks and applications of argumentation-based approaches on Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and subsequently highlights the importance and challenges of attaining monological argumentation on the Semantic Web.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Computer Journal	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1093/comjnl/bxu057	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Computation Theory & Mathematics	en_US
dc.title	Philosophical and logic-based argumentation-driven reasoning approaches and their realization on the WWW: A survey	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	9	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	58	en_US
utslib.for	080301 Bioinformatics Software	en_US
utslib.for	080109 Pattern Recognition and Data Mining	en_US
utslib.for	08 Information and Computing Sciences	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Computer Science
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CAI - Centre for Artificial Intelligence
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	9	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	58	en_US

Abstract:

© 2014 The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. Argumentation is the practice of systematic conscious reasoning involving the construction and evaluation of arguments to justify or support a particular conclusion. This article discusses, compares, contrasts and categorizes existing argumentation-based frameworks and applications as either philosophical or logic-based, and provides critical analysis that emphasizes the structure of arguments and the interactions between them. This review compares and contrasts the frameworks and applications of argumentation-based approaches on Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and subsequently highlights the importance and challenges of attaining monological argumentation on the Semantic Web.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/34725