Philosophical and logic-based argumentation-driven reasoning approaches and their realization on the WWW: A survey
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Computer Journal, 2014, 58 (9), pp. 1967 - 1999
- Issue Date:
|The Computer Journal-2014-Janjua-comjnl_bxu057.pdf||Published Version||832.2 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2014 The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. Argumentation is the practice of systematic conscious reasoning involving the construction and evaluation of arguments to justify or support a particular conclusion. This article discusses, compares, contrasts and categorizes existing argumentation-based frameworks and applications as either philosophical or logic-based, and provides critical analysis that emphasizes the structure of arguments and the interactions between them. This review compares and contrasts the frameworks and applications of argumentation-based approaches on Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and subsequently highlights the importance and challenges of attaining monological argumentation on the Semantic Web.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: