Are sustainable building retrofits delivering sustainable outcomes?

Wilkinson, S

Are sustainable building retrofits delivering sustainable outcomes?

Wilkinson, S

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 2013, 19 (2), pp. 211 - 222
Issue Date:: 2013-06-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Submitted VersionAdobe PDF (325.29 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wilkinson, S https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9266-1858	en_US
dc.date.available	2020-05-25T19:11:32Z
dc.date.issued	2013-06-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 2013, 19 (2), pp. 211 - 222	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1444-5921	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35225
dc.description.abstract	© 2013, University of Western Sydney. All rights reserved. Retrofit is driven by numerous drivers such as building obsolescence and the need to attract new tenants, another driver over recent years being the goal of sustainability. Pointedly, most existing stock was built without consideration of sustainability. Sustainability was legislated in 2006 in the Building Code of Australia, with minimum standards established for energy efficiency. In 2008, Melbourne launched the 1200 Buildings Program to deliver carbon neutrality by 2020 on the premise that retrofitting two thirds of the office stock would deliver a 38% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Further Australian legislation followed in respect of energy and buildings. In 2010, the Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure Act, focused attention on minimum energy standards when leasing or selling office space.In this research, a series of illustrative case studies are used to examine two research aims, being to gain a deeper understanding of the improvements made to offices retrofitted within the 1200 Buildings Program and, secondly, to evaluate the outcomes against the project objectives. The case studies cover the Melbourne CBD area in Victoria, Australia.The results show that the measures taken by owners were mostly focussed on building services and energy efficiency. Overall, far less work was undertaken to thermally upgrade the building fabric, to address issues such as water economy or related to social sustainability. This was acceptable to some extent as the program within which the works were taken, the 1200 Buildings Program, is primarily focussed on reducing building related carbon emissions. However, the results reveal that even when opportunities are there for other sustainability measures to be adopted, owners do not always take those opportunities and that wider sustainability issues are not necessarily that important in this market.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Pacific Rim Property Research Journal	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1080/14445921.2013.11104382	en_US
dc.title	Are sustainable building retrofits delivering sustainable outcomes?	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	19	en_US
utslib.for	1202 Building	en_US
utslib.for	12 Built Environment and Design	en_US
utslib.for	14 Economics	en_US
utslib.for	15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Built Environment
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	19	en_US

Abstract:

© 2013, University of Western Sydney. All rights reserved. Retrofit is driven by numerous drivers such as building obsolescence and the need to attract new tenants, another driver over recent years being the goal of sustainability. Pointedly, most existing stock was built without consideration of sustainability. Sustainability was legislated in 2006 in the Building Code of Australia, with minimum standards established for energy efficiency. In 2008, Melbourne launched the 1200 Buildings Program to deliver carbon neutrality by 2020 on the premise that retrofitting two thirds of the office stock would deliver a 38% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Further Australian legislation followed in respect of energy and buildings. In 2010, the Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure Act, focused attention on minimum energy standards when leasing or selling office space.In this research, a series of illustrative case studies are used to examine two research aims, being to gain a deeper understanding of the improvements made to offices retrofitted within the 1200 Buildings Program and, secondly, to evaluate the outcomes against the project objectives. The case studies cover the Melbourne CBD area in Victoria, Australia.The results show that the measures taken by owners were mostly focussed on building services and energy efficiency. Overall, far less work was undertaken to thermally upgrade the building fabric, to address issues such as water economy or related to social sustainability. This was acceptable to some extent as the program within which the works were taken, the 1200 Buildings Program, is primarily focussed on reducing building related carbon emissions. However, the results reveal that even when opportunities are there for other sustainability measures to be adopted, owners do not always take those opportunities and that wider sustainability issues are not necessarily that important in this market.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35225