Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property

Grau, U

Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property

Grau, U

Permalink

Publisher:: ASCA Press
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: http://www.acsa-arch.org/programs-events/conferences/annual-meeting/102nd-annual-meeting, 2014, 1 pp. 80 - 84
Issue Date:: 2014

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Urtzi Grau - Patents, Notes on Architectural IP.pdf	Published version	2.46 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Grau, U https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-1615	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Stuart, J	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Wilson, M	en_US
dc.date	2014-04-10	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	http://www.acsa-arch.org/programs-events/conferences/annual-meeting/102nd-annual-meeting, 2014, 1 pp. 80 - 84	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-0-935502-86-2	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35769
dc.description.abstract	Architecture is probably the one creative field in which the flow of knowledge is least regulated. For instance, compare it to music or cinema in which copyright laws dictate the maximum length of the fragments that can be freely used by others. Think of the legal implications that terms such as plagiarism, quotation, or paraphrasing have in literature. Remember how intellectual property (IP) rights render illegal any transformation of a work of art not sanctioned by its author. Albeit architecture, since 1990, has enjoyed a legal status similar to these other fields, none of these principles sen to apply. In fact, IP regulations remain mostly underdeveloped and rarely enforced.	en_US
dc.publisher	ASCA Press	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	http://www.acsa-arch.org/programs-events/conferences/annual-meeting/102nd-annual-meeting	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) Annual Meeting	en_US
dc.title	Preventive IP: Notes on the State of Architectural Intellectual Property	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.location	Washington, D.C.	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Miami Beach	en_US
utslib.for	1201 Architecture	en_US
dc.location.activity	Miami Beach
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2014-04-12	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Washington, D.C.	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.start-date	2014-04-10	en_US
pubs.volume	1	en_US

Abstract:

Architecture is probably the one creative field in which the flow of knowledge is least regulated. For instance, compare it to music or cinema in which copyright laws dictate the maximum length of the fragments that can be freely used by others. Think of the legal implications that terms such as plagiarism, quotation, or paraphrasing have in literature. Remember how intellectual property (IP) rights render illegal any transformation of a work of art not sanctioned by its author. Albeit architecture, since 1990, has enjoyed a legal status similar to these other fields, none of these principles sen to apply. In fact, IP regulations remain mostly underdeveloped and rarely enforced.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/35769