A Panorama of Iterated Revision
- Publication Type:
- Chapter
- Citation:
- Outstanding Contributions to Logic, 2014, 3 pp. 71 - 94
- Issue Date:
- 2014-01-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | IR_(camera_ready).pdf | Accepted Manuscript version | 296.91 kB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. In 1985, David Makinson, together with Carlos Alchourron and Peter Gärdenfors published an article, the now renowned “AGM paper”, that gave rise to an entire new area of research: Belief Revision. The AGM paper set the stage for studying belief revision and provided the first fundamental results in the area. There was however one aspect of belief revision that was not addressed in the AGM paper: iterated belief revision. Since 1985, there have been numerous attempts to tackle this problem. In this chapter, we shall review some of the most influential approaches to the problem of iterated belief revision, and discuss their strengths and shortcomings.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

