Exclusion and Re-emplacement: Tensions around Protected Areas in Australia and Southeast Asia

Goodall, H

Exclusion and Re-emplacement: Tensions around Protected Areas in Australia and Southeast Asia

Goodall, H

Permalink

Publisher:: Sage Publications india P/L
Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Conservation and Society, 2006, 4 (3), pp. 383 - 395
Issue Date:: 2006-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (870.6 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Goodall, H https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-5624	en_US
dc.date.issued	2006-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Conservation and Society, 2006, 4 (3), pp. 383 - 395	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0972-4923	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3614
dc.description.abstract	THE DEBATES AROUND CONSERVATION and social justice are urgent, as Rangarajan and Shahabuddin (this issue) demonstrates, but these debates have not followed the same course in different countries. The histories of protected areas and people in countries other than India highlight differences as well as similarities. This response considers the questions raised from an Australian perspective, but these issues are not constrained by national borders. They reflect instead the three-way tensions between the specifics of local circumstances, the motives of governments and the prevailing international pressures. So while this paper starts from an Australian position, it moves to consider East Timor and Thailand, where numbers of Australians can be found today working as researches, staff or volunteers in conservation or development NGOs. Just as important are the questions arising in Vietnam, because it is from here that significant and articulate minority of Australia's population draw their family background, their continuing relationships and their experience of the interaction of protected areas and local peoples.	en_US
dc.publisher	Sage Publications india P/L	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Conservation and Society	en_US
dc.title	Exclusion and Re-emplacement: Tensions around Protected Areas in Australia and Southeast Asia	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	3	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.for	1606 Political Science	en_US
utslib.for	0502 Environmental Science and Management	en_US
utslib.for	1604 Human Geography	en_US
dc.location.activity	Katoomba, Australia
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/e-Press
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences/FASS Faculty Administration
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCS - Cosmopolitan Civil Societies
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.issue	3	en_US
pubs.volume	4	en_US

Abstract:

THE DEBATES AROUND CONSERVATION and social justice are urgent, as Rangarajan and Shahabuddin (this issue) demonstrates, but these debates have not followed the same course in different countries. The histories of protected areas and people in countries other than India highlight differences as well as similarities. This response considers the questions raised from an Australian perspective, but these issues are not constrained by national borders. They reflect instead the three-way tensions between the specifics of local circumstances, the motives of governments and the prevailing international pressures. So while this paper starts from an Australian position, it moves to consider East Timor and Thailand, where numbers of Australians can be found today working as researches, staff or volunteers in conservation or development NGOs. Just as important are the questions arising in Vietnam, because it is from here that significant and articulate minority of Australia's population draw their family background, their continuing relationships and their experience of the interaction of protected areas and local peoples.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/3614