Urine diversion & reuse in Australia: A homeless paradigm or sustainable solution for the future? (Masters thesis)

Publisher:
The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies
Publication Type:
Report
Citation:
2006, pp. 1 - 141
Issue Date:
2006-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
ThumbnailCordell2006UrineDiversion.pdfPublished version3.62 MB
Adobe PDF
This thesis found that while urine diversion is likely to benefit the Australia situation and warrants further research, these benefits are fragmented and spread across a range of discourses and separate institutions. Its acceptance and effective introduction into Australia might therefore be challenged by its lack of a single obvious organisational home. To overcome this and other identified challenges, several recommendations are made. For example, an Australian demonstration trial of urine diversion and reuse is recommended where clear drivers and opportunities exist, such as: in new developments adjacent to agricultural land; in regions where algal blooms are a critical problem and are predominantly caused by municipal sewage discharges; and where synergies with waterless urinals are being considered for water conservation value. This thesis does not promote urine diversion and reuse as the `silver bullet to Australias water and nutrient problems, however it does recommend that it be considered on an equal basis next to other possible options. For example, if reducing nutrient loads on receiving water bodies is a key objective, then a cost-effective analysis of urine diversion and reuse, compared to other options to reduce nutrient loads, could be undertaken, ensuring all relevant costs and benefits to the whole of society are included in the analysis.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: