Detecting Sustainable Programming Languages through Forking on Open Source Projects for Survivability

Chua, B

Detecting Sustainable Programming Languages through Forking on Open Source Projects for Survivability

Chua, B

Permalink

Publisher:: IEEE
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: IEEE, 2015, pp. 120 - 124
Issue Date:: 2015-11-02

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	ISSRE 2015 Supplementary Proceedings - Workshops.pdf.pdf	Published version	9.1 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Chua, B	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Voas	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Bojanova General Co-Chairs, I	en_US
dc.date	2015-11-02	en_US
dc.date.issued	2015-11-02	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	IEEE, 2015, pp. 120 - 124	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781509004058	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/39006
dc.description.abstract	This paper proposes a technique to detect the chance of programming languages used in Apache, Mozilla and Ubuntu surviving from a forking perspective. This line of investigation is important because there is currently no evidence showing which programming language is sustainable in the context of forking. Moreover, there is little evidence to compare and analyse open source project programming language continuity. The research outcome showed Apache, Mozilla and Ubuntu are different types of programming languages that are sustainable can increase their survivability. The more sustainable a programming language is, the more forking is expected. In contrast, a less sustainable a programming language is, the less likely the programming language will survive.	en_US
dc.publisher	IEEE	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	IEEE	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/ISSREW.2015.7392056	en_US
dc.rights	© 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.	en_US
dc.title	Detecting Sustainable Programming Languages through Forking on Open Source Projects for Survivability	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	Piscataway, USA	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Gaithersburg, USA	en_US
utslib.for	080309 Software Engineering	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Students
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2015-11-05	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Piscataway, USA	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.start-date	2015-11-02	en_US

Abstract:

This paper proposes a technique to detect the chance of programming languages used in Apache, Mozilla and Ubuntu surviving from a forking perspective. This line of investigation is important because there is currently no evidence showing which programming language is sustainable in the context of forking. Moreover, there is little evidence to compare and analyse open source project programming language continuity. The research outcome showed Apache, Mozilla and Ubuntu are different types of programming languages that are sustainable can increase their survivability. The more sustainable a programming language is, the more forking is expected. In contrast, a less sustainable a programming language is, the less likely the programming language will survive.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/39006