Architectural Replicas - Four Hyopthesis on the use of Agnostic Copies in the Architectural Field

Publisher:
Treatise
Publication Type:
Book
Citation:
2015
Issue Date:
2015
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2015_03_10_FAKEindustries_revisions.pdfPublished version32.16 MB
Adobe PDF
The word “replica” bears a double meaning; it designates a literal reproduction of a preexisting work and, in a sense denoted in Romance languages, a response to a previous statement. Replicas that respond to the first part of this definition have played a structural role in the history of architecture. For centuries, plaster casts of architectural fragments circulated through Beaux-Arts Schools and professional ateliers as proof of the existence of an ideal, from which to copy. The second part of the definition adds nuance. Can one produce a work of architecture that already exists, and by doing so, take a position? (Not by chance; “replica”—translated as “reply”— often designates the representative’s right to answer in parliament.) We believe that there are architectural replicas that respond to both meanings. We call them agonistic copies
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: