Comparing Frame Creation and TRIZ: from model to methodology

Dorst, K; Kokotovich, V

Comparing Frame Creation and TRIZ: from model to methodology

Dorst, K

Kokotovich, V

Permalink

Publisher:: IASDR 2015
Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: IASDR2015 INTERPLAY Proceedings, 2015, pp. 598 - 608
Issue Date:: 2015-11-02

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted Manuscript versionAdobe PDF (665.16 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Dorst, K https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-2348	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Kokotovich, V	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Popovic, V	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Blackler, A	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Luh, DB	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Nimkulrat, N	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Kraal, B	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Nagai, Y	en_US
dc.date	2015-11-02	en_US
dc.date.issued	2015-11-02	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	IASDR2015 INTERPLAY Proceedings, 2015, pp. 598 - 608	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-0-646-94318-3	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41436
dc.description.abstract	In this paper we discuss a core quality of expert design practice, the ability to create new approaches to problems. If design can be seen as connecting Humanity to Technology, then the Frame Creation model we will introduce here focuses on the Human side of the problem, while an Engineering Design methodology like Theory of Inventive Problem Solving [TRIZ] does the same for the technical side of the equation. We will first illustrate such a complex Frame Creation project, using an example to establish an informal proof-of-concept. This raises the question how may we move from such a proof-of-concept to critically develop and validate a complete methodology. To answer this question we will draw parallels between the evolution of the well-developed and accepted TRIZ in Engineering Design, and the continuing evolutionary trajectory of “Frame Creation”.	en_US
dc.publisher	IASDR 2015	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	IASDR2015 INTERPLAY Proceedings	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	International Association of Societies of Design Research	en_US
dc.title	Comparing Frame Creation and TRIZ: from model to methodology	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.location	Brisbane Australia	en_US
utslib.location.activity	Brisbane, Australia	en_US
utslib.for	1203 Design Practice and Management	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Design
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CCDP - Contemporary Design Practice
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.finish-date	2015-11-05	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	Brisbane Australia	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.start-date	2015-11-02	en_US

Abstract:

In this paper we discuss a core quality of expert design practice, the ability to create new approaches to problems. If design can be seen as connecting Humanity to Technology, then the Frame Creation model we will introduce here focuses on the Human side of the problem, while an Engineering Design methodology like Theory of Inventive Problem Solving [TRIZ] does the same for the technical side of the equation. We will first illustrate such a complex Frame Creation project, using an example to establish an informal proof-of-concept. This raises the question how may we move from such a proof-of-concept to critically develop and validate a complete methodology. To answer this question we will draw parallels between the evolution of the well-developed and accepted TRIZ in Engineering Design, and the continuing evolutionary trajectory of “Frame Creation”.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41436