Field |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Grau, U
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-1615
|
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Goberna Pesudo, C |
en_US |
dc.date |
2015-04-11 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Chatter: Architecture Talks Back |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-0-300-21063-7 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41474
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
Today’s society has had a profound influence on the discipline of architecture, yet despite the utilization of current technologies, these contemporary works are not divorced from history. Chatter: Architecture Talks Back is about just that—having a dialogue, talking back to architecture of the past. Works from the Art Institute’s vast collection of architecture and design are presented alongside these five ultra-current practitioners to highlight this conversation. As these architects apply new technology to a confluence of historical influences and theories in order to conceive new designs and ideas, they are constantly expanding the dialogues within the legacy of their field. This dynamic installation makes readily apparent how each studio recognizes that the architectural past, though a shared language, is sometimes best understood with modern punctuation. |
en_US |
dc.format |
Models, Images, video |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Yale University Press and the Art Institute of Chicago |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Chatter: Architecture Talks Back |
en_US |
dc.title |
More Rooms |
en_US |
dc.type |
Exhibition |
|
utslib.location |
Art Institute Chicago |
en_US |
pubs.embargo.period |
Not known |
en_US |
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Architecture |
|
utslib.copyright.status |
closed_access |
|
pubs.consider-herdc |
true |
en_US |
pubs.finish-date |
2015-07-12 |
en_US |
pubs.place-of-publication |
Art Institute Chicago |
en_US |
pubs.start-date |
2015-04-11 |
en_US |
pubs.rights-statement |
This research is in the field of Architectural representation. Robin Evans define architecture as the act of translation between drawings and buildings and Karen Kice updates that definition introducing contemporary modes of communication such as texting, Twitter, and Instagram. How to define architecture in a moment when the stability of its traditional means of representation are challenged by an explosion of ever-changing digital formats? The four pieces presented in the exhibition refer back to the same project, yet they do not come together easily. They demonstrate that architectural documents are autonomous and yet they are also part of larger socio-political constructs. Support for the exhibition was provided by Celia and David Hilliard, the Butler-Vander-Linden Family Fund for Architecture and Design, and the Architecture & Design Society. The exhibition was broadly reviewed including magazines such as the Journal of the American Institute of Architects, MasContext, The Architects Newspaper or Metalocus. |
en_US |
pubs.rights-statement |
Research Background This research is in the field of Architectural representation. Robin Evans define architecture as the act of translation between drawings and buildings and Karen Kice updates that definition introducing contemporary modes of communication such as texting, Twitter, and Instagram. How to define architecture in a moment when the stability of its traditional means of representation are challenged by an explosion of ever-changing digital formats? Research Contribution The four pieces presented in the exhibition refer back to the same project, yet they do not come together easily. They demonstrate that architectural documents are autonomous and yet they are also part of larger socio-political constructs. Research Significance Support for the exhibition was provided by Celia and David Hilliard, the Butler-Vander-Linden Family Fund for Architecture and Design, and the Architecture & Design Society. The exhibition was broadly reviewed including magazines such as the Journal of the American Institute of Architects, MasContext, The Architects Newspaper or Metalocus. |
en_US |