Regeneration beyond austerity: A collective viewpoint

Pugalis, L; Liddle, J; Deas, I; Bailey, N; Pill, M; Green, C; Pearson, C; Reeve, A; Shipley, R; Manns, J; Dickinson, S; Joyce, P; Marlow, D; Havers, I; Rowe, M; Southern, A; Headlam, N; Janssen-Jansen, L; Lloyd, G; Doyle, J; Cummings, C; McGuinness, D; Broughton, K; Berkeley, N; Jarvis, D

Regeneration beyond austerity: A collective viewpoint

Liddle, J Deas, I Bailey, N Pill, M Green, C Pearson, C Reeve, A Shipley, R Manns, J Dickinson, S Joyce, P Marlow, D Havers, I Rowe, M Southern, A Headlam, N Janssen-Jansen, L Lloyd, G Doyle, J Cummings, C McGuinness, D Broughton, K Berkeley, N Jarvis, D

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2014, 7 (2), pp. 188 - 197
Issue Date:: 2014-01-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2014 - Regeneration beyond austerity - a collective viewpoint - Pugalis et al.pdf	Published Version	69.52 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pugalis, L https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8987-6356	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Liddle, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Deas, I	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Bailey, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Pill, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Green, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Pearson, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Reeve, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Shipley, R	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Manns, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Dickinson, S	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Joyce, P	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Marlow, D	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Havers, I	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Rowe, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Southern, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Headlam, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Janssen-Jansen, L	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lloyd, G	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Doyle, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Cummings, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	McGuinness, D	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Broughton, K	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Berkeley, N	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Jarvis, D	en_US
dc.date.issued	2014-01-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2014, 7 (2), pp. 188 - 197	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1752-9638	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41748
dc.description.abstract	© Henry Stewart Publications. This collective viewpoint concludes the special issue investigating austerity era regeneration by weaving different threads from each published article together with further insights. It is a collaborative effort — a synthesis of some diverse views and opinions — that seeks to extract some key themes, trends and possibilities relating to regeneration beyond austerity. Despite some significant concerns, the broader ‘regeneration project’ continues in distinct ways and at different paces. Through this paper, the authors attempt to stimulate debate concerning the evolution and recasting of regeneration over future years. It is hoped that this may lay some of the foundations for a new, more positive and progressive regeneration narrative, grounded in micro-practices and the particularities of place.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal	en_US
dc.title	Regeneration beyond austerity: A collective viewpoint	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	2	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	7	en_US
utslib.for	1205 Urban and Regional Planning	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/lnstitute for Public Policy and Governance
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - IPPG - Institute for Public Policy and Governance
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	2	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	7	en_US

Abstract:

© Henry Stewart Publications. This collective viewpoint concludes the special issue investigating austerity era regeneration by weaving different threads from each published article together with further insights. It is a collaborative effort — a synthesis of some diverse views and opinions — that seeks to extract some key themes, trends and possibilities relating to regeneration beyond austerity. Despite some significant concerns, the broader ‘regeneration project’ continues in distinct ways and at different paces. Through this paper, the authors attempt to stimulate debate concerning the evolution and recasting of regeneration over future years. It is hoped that this may lay some of the foundations for a new, more positive and progressive regeneration narrative, grounded in micro-practices and the particularities of place.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/41748