Uplink performance analysis of dense cellular networks with LoS and NLoS transmissions

Ding, T; Ding, M; Mao, G; Lin, Z; Lopez-Perez, D

Uplink performance analysis of dense cellular networks with LoS and NLoS transmissions

Ding, T

Ding, M Mao, G

Lin, Z Lopez-Perez, D

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016, 2016
Issue Date:: 2016-07-12

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download Accepted Manuscript versionAdobe PDF (446.14 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Ding, T https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-7984	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ding, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Mao, G https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-4949	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lin, Z	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lopez-Perez, D	en_US
dc.date.issued	2016-07-12	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016, 2016	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9781479966646	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43947
dc.description.abstract	© 2016 IEEE. In this paper, we analyse the coverage probability and the area spectral efficiency (ASE) in the uplink (UL) of dense small cell networks (SCNs) considering a piecewise linear path loss model incorporating both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) transmissions. The performance impact of LoS and NLoS transmissions in the ASE of the UL of dense SCNs is shown to be significant, both quantitatively and qualitatively, compared with previous works that do not differentiate LoS and NLoS transmissions. In particular, previous works predicted that a larger UL power compensation factor would always result in a better ASE in the practical range of user equipment (UE) density, i.e., 100 ∼ 103 UEs/km2. However, our results show that a smaller UL power compensation factor can greatly boost the ASE in the UL of dense SCNs, i.e., 102∼103 UEs/km2, while a larger UL power compensation factor is more suitable for sparse SCNs, i.e., 100∼102 UEs/km2.	en_US
dc.relation	http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP110100538
dc.relation.ispartof	2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2016	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/ICC.2016.7510957	en_US
dc.title	Uplink performance analysis of dense cellular networks with LoS and NLoS transmissions	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	0805 Distributed Computing	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Electrical and Data Engineering
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CRIN - Realtime Information Networks
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Students
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

© 2016 IEEE. In this paper, we analyse the coverage probability and the area spectral efficiency (ASE) in the uplink (UL) of dense small cell networks (SCNs) considering a piecewise linear path loss model incorporating both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) transmissions. The performance impact of LoS and NLoS transmissions in the ASE of the UL of dense SCNs is shown to be significant, both quantitatively and qualitatively, compared with previous works that do not differentiate LoS and NLoS transmissions. In particular, previous works predicted that a larger UL power compensation factor would always result in a better ASE in the practical range of user equipment (UE) density, i.e., 100 ∼ 103 UEs/km2. However, our results show that a smaller UL power compensation factor can greatly boost the ASE in the UL of dense SCNs, i.e., 102∼103 UEs/km2, while a larger UL power compensation factor is more suitable for sparse SCNs, i.e., 100∼102 UEs/km2.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/43947