Analysis of surface asperity flattening based on two different methods
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2016, 28 (6), pp. 1623 - 1634
- Issue Date:
|Analysis of surface asperity flattening based on two different methods.pdf||Published Version||3.14 MB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. The stress state is an important parameter in metal forming processes, which significantly influences the strain state and microstructure of products, affecting their surface qualities. In order to make the metal products have a good surface quality, the surface stress state must be optimised. In this study, two classical methods, the upper bound method and the crystal plasticity finite element method, were investigated. The differences between the two methods were discussed in regard to the model, the velocity field, and the strain field. Then the related surface roughness is deduced.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: