Evaluation of the implementation process and outcomes of a professional pharmacy service in a community pharmacy setting. A case report

Publisher:
Elsevier BV
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2017, 13 (3), pp. 614 - 627
Issue Date:
2017
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
AE52AF65-CAC4-42B5-B36A-D3A1E20A6436.pdfAccepted Manuscript Version890.79 kB
Adobe PDF
Pharmacist-led medication review services are recognized as a key to medicines management. This case study describes the implementation process of a medication review with follow-up service in a community pharmacy setting and evaluates its initial outcomes. An implementation-effectiveness hybrid study was undertaken in a community pharmacy setting. The implementation process was divided into four different phases: Exploration and adoption, program installation, initial implementation, and full operation. A core set of implementation outcomes was measured, including penetration, implementation costs, feasibility, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness and efficiency. The penetration rate of the service was nearly 62.5%, and the implementation costs were 57,359.67€. There was a high retention-participation rate of patients. For every month of service provision, there was a 1.27 increase in the number of patients requesting the service, compared to the number of patients being offered the service. The time spent on service provision was 171.7 min per patient. Average patient satisfaction with the service was 4.82 (SD: 0.39, scale 1–5), and the acceptance rate of care plans by patients and general medical practitioners were 96.99% and 96.46%, respectively. There were 408 negative outcomes associated with the use of medications were identified during the study (3.09 per patient), of which 96.3% were resolved. The average time per patient spent on service provision significantly decreased along the 18 months of service provision. This case report can assist individual pharmacists and professional organizations interested in implementing evidence-based services by offering an example on how to approach the implementation process in a systematic way.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: