Models of judicial tenure: Reconsidering life limits, age limits and term limits for judges

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2015, 35 (4), pp. 627 - 663
Issue Date:
2015-12-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Judicial Tenure v6 (Oct 2014) OJLS.pdf763.65 kB
Adobe PDF
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. Tenure is an important facet of judicial independence and a key principle underpinning the rule of law, yet its protection varies markedly from country to country. This article examines the historical development and empirical experience of three preeminent appellate courts-the Supreme Court of the United States, the High Court of Australia and the Constitutional Court of South Africa-as examples of prevalent models of tenure, namely, life tenure, age limits and term limits. Dissatisfaction with tenure arrangements in each jurisdiction has been impelled by increasing human longevity, growing awareness of incapacities that accompany ageing and changing attitudes to age discrimination. These developments have led to constitutional and legislative reforms to ameliorate the problems that inhere in different models of tenure. However, the choice between models, and between key parameters within each model, reflect complex policy preferences. The article concludes that hybrid arrangements that incorporate age limits and term limits provide an appropriate compromise between competing policy objectives.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: