Process construction and customization

Henderson-Sellers, B; Serour, M; McBride, T; Gonzalez-Perez, C; Dagher, L

Process construction and customization

Henderson-Sellers, B Serour, M McBride, T

Gonzalez-Perez, C Dagher, L

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2004, 10 (4), pp. 326 - 358
Issue Date:: 2004-12-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (112.99 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Serour, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	McBride, T https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-7952	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Gonzalez-Perez, C	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Dagher, L	en_US
dc.date.issued	2004-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2004, 10 (4), pp. 326 - 358	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6107
dc.description.abstract	Adopting the most appropriate methodology for particular software developments remains a challenge for all industrial IT organizations. Previous attempts to promote a single approach as useful for all occasions has proven untenable. Rather, a combination of a metamodel and a repository of process/method components ("method engineering") provides a more efficacious approach, particularly as elements of the method engineering approach are able to be automated. In this paper, we advocate the use of method engineering, illustrating its utility by the construction of methodologies at various levels of process capability. © J.UCS.	en_US
dc.relation	http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/C19700231
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Universal Computer Science	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Computation Theory & Mathematics	en_US
dc.title	Process construction and customization	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	4	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	10	en_US
utslib.for	080309 Software Engineering	en_US
utslib.for	080608 Information Systems Development Methodologies	en_US
utslib.for	01 Mathematical Sciences	en_US
utslib.for	08 Information and Computing Sciences	en_US
dc.location.activity	Innsbruck, AUSTRIA
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.issue	4	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	10	en_US

Abstract:

Adopting the most appropriate methodology for particular software developments remains a challenge for all industrial IT organizations. Previous attempts to promote a single approach as useful for all occasions has proven untenable. Rather, a combination of a metamodel and a repository of process/method components ("method engineering") provides a more efficacious approach, particularly as elements of the method engineering approach are able to be automated. In this paper, we advocate the use of method engineering, illustrating its utility by the construction of methodologies at various levels of process capability. © J.UCS.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6107