A comparison of deontic matrices, maps and activity diagrams for the construction of situational methods

Seidita, V; Ralyté, J; Henderson-Sellers, B; Cossentino, M; Arni-Bloch, N

A comparison of deontic matrices, maps and activity diagrams for the construction of situational methods

Seidita, V Ralyté, J Henderson-Sellers, B Cossentino, M Arni-Bloch, N

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2007, 247 pp. 85 - 88
Issue Date:: 2007-12-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (137.11 kB)

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Seidita, V	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Ralyté, J	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Henderson-Sellers, B	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Cossentino, M	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Arni-Bloch, N	en_US
dc.date.issued	2007-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2007, 247 pp. 85 - 88	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1613-0073	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6755
dc.description.abstract	Several approaches have been proposed to support situational method engineering (SME), each of them providing different techniques and using different basic concepts. In this work, we propose a framework for comparing SME approaches based on a generic SME process model. Three approaches are presented and compared by using this framework.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	CEUR Workshop Proceedings	en_US
dc.title	A comparison of deontic matrices, maps and activity diagrams for the construction of situational methods	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.citation.volume	247	en_US
utslib.for	080608 Information Systems Development Methodologies	en_US
dc.location.activity	Trondheim, Norway	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	247	en_US

Abstract:

Several approaches have been proposed to support situational method engineering (SME), each of them providing different techniques and using different basic concepts. In this work, we propose a framework for comparing SME approaches based on a generic SME process model. Three approaches are presented and compared by using this framework.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6755