The LOGIC negotiation model

Sierra, C; Debenham, J

The LOGIC negotiation model

Sierra, C

Debenham, J

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2007, pp. 1030 - 1037
Issue Date:: 2007-12-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (593.85 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Sierra, C https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-6233	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Debenham, J	en_US
dc.date.issued	2007-12-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2007, pp. 1030 - 1037	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9788190426275	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6916
dc.description.abstract	Successful negotiators prepare by determining their position along five dimensions: Legitimacy, Options, Goals, Independence, and Commitment, (LOGIC). We introduce a negotiation model based on these dimensions and on two primitive concepts: intimacy (degree of closeness) and balance (degree of fairness). The intimacy is a pair of matrices that evaluate both an agent's contribution to the relationship and its opponent's contribution each from an information view and from a utilitarian view across the five LOGIC dimensions. The balance is the difference between these matrices. A relationship strategy maintains a target intimacy for each relationship that an agent would like the relationship to move towards in future. The negotiation strategy maintains a set of Options that are in-line with the current intimacy level, and then tactics wrap the Options in argumentation with the aim of attaining a successful deal and manipulating the successive negotiation balances towards the target intimacy. © 2007 IFAAMAS.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1145/1329125.1329419	en_US
dc.title	The LOGIC negotiation model	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	080105 Expert Systems	en_US
utslib.for	080101 Adaptive Agents and Intelligent Robotics	en_US
dc.location.activity	Honolulu, Hawai'i	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Software
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - AAI - Advanced Analytics Institute Research Centre
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Successful negotiators prepare by determining their position along five dimensions: Legitimacy, Options, Goals, Independence, and Commitment, (LOGIC). We introduce a negotiation model based on these dimensions and on two primitive concepts: intimacy (degree of closeness) and balance (degree of fairness). The intimacy is a pair of matrices that evaluate both an agent's contribution to the relationship and its opponent's contribution each from an information view and from a utilitarian view across the five LOGIC dimensions. The balance is the difference between these matrices. A relationship strategy maintains a target intimacy for each relationship that an agent would like the relationship to move towards in future. The negotiation strategy maintains a set of Options that are in-line with the current intimacy level, and then tactics wrap the Options in argumentation with the aim of attaining a successful deal and manipulating the successive negotiation balances towards the target intimacy. © 2007 IFAAMAS.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/6916