Thinking Heidegger's post aesthetics through the expanded field of painting.

Titmarsh, M

Thinking Heidegger's post aesthetics through the expanded field of painting.

Titmarsh, M

Permalink

Publisher:: Liverpool Hope University Press
Publication Type:: Chapter
Citation:: The Turn to Aesthetics. An Interdisciplinary Exchange of Ideas in Applied and Philosophical Aestheti, 2008, pp. 168 - 179
Issue Date:: 2008-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	2008002582OK.pdf		1.25 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Titmarsh, M https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-3867	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Palmer, C	en_US
dc.contributor.editor	Torevell, D	en_US
dc.date.issued	2008-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	The Turn to Aesthetics. An Interdisciplinary Exchange of Ideas in Applied and Philosophical Aestheti, 2008, pp. 168 - 179	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	978-0-9515847-3-6	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/7921
dc.description.abstract	At a certain point in the late 20lh century the word "aesthetics" withdrew from active service in the theoretical vocabulary of art. It had become both too universal and too particular. Too universal in that everything had become aesthetic, sport, management, theology, and so nothing was more aesthetic than anything else, not even art. Too particular in that aesthetics was unable to confront the present situation of avant-garde art as it unfolded during modernism and postmodernism. Hence aesthetics was replaced by new disciplines for thinking about art: critical theory, art theory, cultural theory, the philosophy of art and so on. The struggle to find the proper name and form for thinking about art goes on.	en_US
dc.publisher	Liverpool Hope University Press	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	The Turn to Aesthetics. An Interdisciplinary Exchange of Ideas in Applied and Philosophical Aestheti	en_US
dc.title	Thinking Heidegger's post aesthetics through the expanded field of painting.	en_US
dc.type	Chapter
utslib.location	UK	en_US
utslib.for	1203 Design Practice and Management	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building/School of Design
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.consider-herdc	true	en_US
pubs.place-of-publication	UK	en_US

Abstract:

At a certain point in the late 20lh century the word "aesthetics" withdrew from active service in the theoretical vocabulary of art. It had become both too universal and too particular. Too universal in that everything had become aesthetic, sport, management, theology, and so nothing was more aesthetic than anything else, not even art. Too particular in that aesthetics was unable to confront the present situation of avant-garde art as it unfolded during modernism and postmodernism. Hence aesthetics was replaced by new disciplines for thinking about art: critical theory, art theory, cultural theory, the philosophy of art and so on. The struggle to find the proper name and form for thinking about art goes on.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/7921