Things to learn and things to abandon: A comparative study of the communications consumer redress scheme in Australia, Japan and Korea

Publisher:
Telecommunications Association
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Australian Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 2015, 3 (2), pp. 47 - 69
Issue Date:
2015-06-30
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
AJTDE2015V003N02_047.pdfPublished Version730.51 kB
Adobe PDF
This article compares the telecommunications consumer dispute resolution scheme in Australia, Japan and Korea based on the telecommunications consumer policy principles developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2011 and the guidelines and recommendations developed by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) in 2013. This article concludes that the Australian consumer dispute resolution scheme (the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman scheme) appears to be the best practice among these three jurisdictions studied, followed by the consumer scheme in Korea. Both the current Japanese scheme and the proposed new scheme in Japan appear to be less appropriate due to the foreseeable inadequate accessibility and insufficient consumer redress authority created under the scheme. Nonetheless, much experience and exceptional practices can all be shared and learned by the regulatory decisionmakers in all three countries.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: