The ""jurisdictional fact doctrine"" in New South Wales local government and environmental planning law
- Publisher:
- Thomson Lawbook Company
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Ellis-Jones Ian 2006, 'The "jurisdictional fact doctrine" in New South Wales local government and environmental planning law', Thomson Lawbook Co., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 16-35.
- Issue Date:
- 2006
Closed Access
Filename | Description | Size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006005493.pdf | 1.29 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Errors made with respect to jurisdictional matters, including errors made with
respect to so-called 'Jurisdictional facts", are reviewable for 'Jurisdictional
error". A jurisdictional fact is some fact or fact situation which must exist in
fact as a condition precedent or essential prerequisite for the primary
decision-maker to exercise its jurisdiction. Over the past 15 years New South
Wales superior courts have increasingly applied the so-called 'Jurisdictional
fact doctrine" in local government and environmental planning law cases.
This article discusses a number of important judicial authorities and seeks to
identify what the key elements or indicators of the presence of a jurisdictional
fact situation in a particular statutory formulation are. They include: the
interrelated elements of "objectivity" and "essentiality"; the purpose of the
formulation in the overall legislative scheme; the inconvenience, if any, that
may arise from the fact situation being held to be jurisdictional; whether the
fact situation occurs or arises as a matter for consideration or as a matter to
be ultimately adjudicated upon by the tribunal of fact; whether the fact
situation occurs or arises in the actual formulation of the grant of substantive
power to the tribunal of fact to make the ultimate decision on the merits; and
whether the fact situation occurs or arises in a formulation requiring the
formation by the tribunal of fact of a specified mental state. Ultimately, it is an
issue of statutory construction and legislative intention, with the reviewing
court having the final say, at least on those matters.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: