Making clinical governance work

Publisher:
B M J Publishing Group
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
British Medical Journal, 2004, 329 (18), pp. 679 - 681
Issue Date:
2004-01
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Thumbnail2006009898.pdf80.86 kB
Adobe PDF
Clinical governance has been described as "by far the most high-profile vehicle for securing culture change in the new NHS."1 However, the government's past preoccupation with delivery and top down performance management has undermined its developmental potential.2 To be effective, clinical governance should reach every level of a healthcare organisation. It requires structures and processes that integrate financial control, service performance, and clinical quality in ways that will engage clinicians and generate service improvements.3 We strongly endorse this view. Because clinicians are at the core of clinical work, they must be at the heart of clinical governance. Recognition of this fact by clinicians, managers, and policy makers is central to re-establishing "responsible autonomy" as a foundation principle in the performance and organisation of clinical work. We look at problems with the prevailing model of clinical governance and describe an alternative approach.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: