Auctions versus book-built IPOs in Japan: A comparison of aftermarket volatility

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2008, 16 (3), pp. 224 - 235
Issue Date:
Filename Description Size
2007001451OKfixed.pdf213.39 kB
Adobe PDF
Full metadata record
In a recent theoretical paper, Sherman [Sherman, A.E., 2005, Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions with endogenous entry, Journal of Financial Economics 78, 615-649.] proposes that: "If book building leads to greater expected underpricing relative to uniform price or discriminatory auctions, then it should also lead to less volatility in aftermarket trading...". In this paper, we study a Japanese sample and find that book-built IPOs exhibit greater underpricing and higher aftermarket volatility compared to price-discriminatory auctions. Aftermarket volatility wanes with seasoning in both sub-samples, but the book-built volatility levels are persistently higher than those for auctions for as long as one year after the IPO issue date. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: