Auctions versus book-built IPOs in Japan: A comparison of aftermarket volatility
- Elsevier Inc
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2008, 16 (3), pp. 224 - 235
- Issue Date:
In a recent theoretical paper, Sherman [Sherman, A.E., 2005, Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions with endogenous entry, Journal of Financial Economics 78, 615649.] proposes that: If book building leads to greater expected underpricing relative to uniform price or discriminatory auctions, then it should also lead to less volatility in aftermarket trading. In this paper, we study a Japanese sample and find that book-built IPOs exhibit greater underpricing and higher aftermarket volatility compared to price-discriminatory auctions. Aftermarket volatility wanes with seasoning in both sub-samples, but the book-built volatility levels are persistently higher than those for auctions for as long as one year after the IPO issue date.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: