Research and evaluation: The present and the future

Publisher:
Springer
Publication Type:
Chapter
Citation:
Leading Research and Evaluation in Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice, 2016, pp. 355 - 368
Issue Date:
2016-08-26
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
PAC-10008490.pdfPublished version346.44 kB
Adobe PDF
In the field of interprofessional education (IPE) as academics we are continuously asked: ‘What is the evidence for IPE?’ The question is really about effectiveness and outcomes, and has the sub-text of ‘Why should we change what we do?’ So, does IPE work? In our experience there are fewer questions posed about the effectiveness of team-based practice yet ‘learning together to work together’ (WHO, 1988) seems inherently logical, in the same way that clinically-based education is necessary for clinical practice. Those health systems, which have the luxury of employing a diverse range of health and social care professionals, work on the premise that no one practitioner knows everything or has all the skills required for health care delivery in an increasingly complex environment. However, there are still many areas relating to interprofessional collaborative practice (IPECP) that need exploring and greater understanding through well-designed research projects. These include uncertainties about leadership and ‘followership’, hierarchies and power relationships, the nature of interprofessional identity and that of collaborative practice (CP) itself.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: