Ethical discriminations? Representing the Reprehensible.

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Tamara : Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 2003, 2 (3), pp. 1 - 16
Issue Date:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description SizeFormat
2007004549OK.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDF
This paper reflects upon the 'goodness' or 'ethics' of Critical Management/Critical Organisation Studies (COS) research practices. I argue that academic representations of others entail an ethical responsibility to the researched, a responsibility that COS is, as yet, insufficiently exploring. Reflecting upon my own research with those who have colluded in discrimination and Stanley and Wise's (1979) research on obscene telephone callers, I explore the nature and limits of responsibility when researching those who have acted reprehensibly. I end by arguing that COS "owe(s) some responsibility to 'the researched' of all kinds, whether we morally approve of them or not" (Stanley and Wise 1993:177).
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: