An approach for comparison of architecture level change impact analysis methods and their relevance in web systems evolution

Mehboob, Z; Zowghi, D; Lowe, D

An approach for comparison of architecture level change impact analysis methods and their relevance in web systems evolution

Mehboob, Z Zowghi, D

Lowe, D

Permalink

Publication Type:: Conference Proceeding
Citation:: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC, 2009, pp. 162 - 172
Issue Date:: 2009-10-05

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Adobe PDF

Download full textAdobe PDF (169.48 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Mehboob, Z	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Zowghi, D https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-0155	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Lowe, D	en_US
dc.date.issued	2009-10-05	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC, 2009, pp. 162 - 172	en_US
dc.identifier.isbn	9780769535999	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/10825
dc.description.abstract	Change impact analysis (CIA) methods have been developed to identify the consequences of making changes to system artifacts and to support decision making with regards to that change. There is a growing body of research on CIA methods that specifically addresses changes and their impacts at a system architecture level. Most of the methods have been developed and validated on software system domain. However, there is little research consensus on: (i) the features that architectural CIA methods should comprehensively address; and (ii) which existing methods are comparatively suitable in a particular system domain such as Web systems. This paper presents a comparison approache that offer guidance on the selection of the most appropriate method for CIA activity and suitability of these methods in the context of Web systems. © 2009 IEEE.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1109/ASWEC.2009.39	en_US
dc.title	An approach for comparison of architecture level change impact analysis methods and their relevance in web systems evolution	en_US
dc.type	Conference Proceeding
utslib.for	0803 Computer Software	en_US
dc.location.activity	Gold Coast, Australia	en_US
dc.location.activity	Gold Coast, AUSTRALIA
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/DVC (Research)/Graduate Research School
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology/School of Electrical and Data Engineering
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - HCTD - Human Centred Technology Design
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - STEM Education Futures
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US

Abstract:

Change impact analysis (CIA) methods have been developed to identify the consequences of making changes to system artifacts and to support decision making with regards to that change. There is a growing body of research on CIA methods that specifically addresses changes and their impacts at a system architecture level. Most of the methods have been developed and validated on software system domain. However, there is little research consensus on: (i) the features that architectural CIA methods should comprehensively address; and (ii) which existing methods are comparatively suitable in a particular system domain such as Web systems. This paper presents a comparison approache that offer guidance on the selection of the most appropriate method for CIA activity and suitability of these methods in the context of Web systems. © 2009 IEEE.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/10825