Assessing Overreaching With HRR: What is the Minimal Exercise Intensity Required?

Publisher:
Human Kinetics
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2017, 12 (4), pp. 569 - 573
Issue Date:
2017
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Faster heart rate recovery (HRR) following high-to-maximal exercise (≥90% HRmax) has been reported in athletes suspected of functional overreaching (f-OR). This study investigated whether this response would also occur at lower exercise intensity.HRR and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) responses were compared during an incremental intermittent running protocol to exhaustion in twenty experienced male triathletes (8 control and 13 overload subjects led to f-OR) before (Pre), immediately after an overload training period (Mid) and following a 1-week taper (Post). Both groups demonstrated an increase in HRR values at Mid, but this change was very likely to almost certainly larger in the f-OR group at all running intensities (large to very large differences, e.g. +16 ±7 bpm vs. +3 ±5 bpm, in the f-OR and control groups at 11 km·h-1, respectively). The highest between-group differences in changes in HRR were reported at 11 km·h-1 (13 ±4 bpm) and 12 km·h-1 (10 ±6 bpm). A concomitant increase in RPE at all intensities was reported only in the f-OR group (large-to-extremely large differences, +2.1 ±1.5 to +0.7 ±1.5 AU).These findings confirm that faster HRR does not systematically predict better physical performance. However, when interpreted in the context of the athletes' fatigue state and training phase, HRR following submaximal exercise may be more discriminant than HRR measures taken following maximal exercise for monitoring f-OR. These findings may be applied in practice by regularly assessing HRR following submaximal exercise (i.e., warm-up) for monitoring endurance athletes responses to training.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: