Is the Age Gradient in Self-Reported Material Hardship Explained By Resources, Needs, Behaviors, or Reporting Bias?

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Review of Income and Wealth, 2012, 58 (4), pp. 715 - 741
Issue Date:
2012-12-01
Metrics:
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
ContentServer (20).pdfPublished Version296.16 kB
Adobe PDF
Older people report much less hardship than younger people in a range of contexts, despite lower incomes. Hardship indicators are increasingly influential, so the source of this age gradient has considerable policy implications. We propose a theoretical and empirical strategy to decompose the sources of this relationship. We exploit a unique feature of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics Australia (HILDA) survey, which collects reports of hardship from all adult household members. This facilitates within-couple estimates, allowing us to identify age-related reporting bias. The majority of the raw age-hardship gradient is explained by observed resources, particularly wealth and home ownership. One third of the relationship is explained by unobserved differences between households, which we interpret as age-related behavioral choices. Reporting error does not appear to contribute to the age gradient. © 2011 The Authors. Review of Income and Wealth © 2011 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: