Does anybody like water restrictions? Some observations in Australian urban communities
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2012, 56 (1), pp. 61 - 81
- Issue Date:
Files in This Item:
|Cooper_et_al-2012-Australian_Journal_of_Agricultural_and_Resource_Economics.pdf||Published Version||326.46 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
Mandatory water restrictions continue to be the immediate response to urban water shortages in most major cities in southern Australia. Whilst generally rejected by economists on efficiency grounds, restrictions and the enforcement regimes used to invoke them are, nonetheless, viewed by some in the community as a positive way of dealing with water scarcity. Given the likelihood that urban water restrictions will persist for some time, there is value in understanding householders' attitudes in this context. The impact and acceptability of differing approaches to enforcement is of particular interest, because this has wider ramifications for the administration of policy generally. This paper uses the results from a choice experiment to investigate the interplay between different components of a water restriction regime. In stark contrast to prevailing views that focus on the community benefits from 'sharing the pain of water shortages', results point to the significance of being able to inform on ones neighbours as a component of the enforcement regimes. © 2011 The Authors. AJARE © 2011 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: