Bleeding hearts, profiteers, or both specialist physician fees in an unregulated market

Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Health Economics, 2017, 26 (4), pp. 528 - 535
Issue Date:
2017
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Bleeding hearts profiteers or both specialist physician fees in an unregulated market AM.pdfAccepted Manuscript Version559.17 kB
Adobe PDF
This study shows that, in an unregulated fee-setting environment, specialist physicians practise price discrimination on the basis of their patients’ income status. Our results are consistent with profit maximisation behaviour by specialists. These findings are based on a large population survey that is linked to administrative medical claims records. We find that, for an initial consultation, specialist physicians charge their high-income patients AU$26 more than their low-income patients. While this gap equates to a 19% lower fees for the poorest patients (bottom 25% of the household income distribution), it is unlikely to remove the substantial financial barriers they face in accessing specialist care. There are large variations across specialties, with neurologists exhibiting the largest fee gap between the high-income and low-income patients. Several possible channels for deducing the patient’s income are examined. We find that patient characteristics such as age, health concession card status and private health insurance status are all used by specialists as proxies for income status. These characteristics are particularly important to further practise price discrimination among the low-income patients but are less relevant for the high-income patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: