Understanding stakeholders' perspectives and experiences of general practice accreditation.

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Health Policy, 2017, 121 (7), pp. 816 - 822
Issue Date:
2017-07
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
1-s2.0-S0168851017301446-main.pdfPublished Version391.26 kB
Adobe PDF
OBJECTIVE: To examine general practice accreditation stakeholders' perspectives and experiences to identify program strengths and areas for improvements. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual (n=2) and group (n=9) interviews were conducted between September 2011-March 2012 with 52 stakeholders involved in accreditation in Australian general practices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Member checking activities in April 2016 assessed the credibility and currency of the findings in light of current reforms. RESULTS: Overall, participants endorsed the accreditation program but identified several areas of concern. Noted strengths of the program included: program ownership, peer review and collaborative learning; access to Practice Incentives Program payments; and, improvements in safety and quality. Noted limitations in these and other aspects of the program offer potential for improvement: evidence for the impact of accreditation; resource demands; clearer outcome measures; and, specific experiences of accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of accreditation as a strategy to improve safety and quality was shaped by the attitudes and experience of stakeholders. Strengths and weaknesses in the accreditation program influence, and are influenced by, stakeholder engagement and disengagement. After several accreditation cycles, the sector has the opportunity to reflect on, review and improve the process. This will be important if the continued or extended engagement of practices is to be realised to assure the continuation and effectiveness of the accreditation program.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: