The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing

Katic, M; Agarwal, R

The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing

Katic, M

Agarwal, R

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2018, 19 pp. 69 - 86
Issue Date:: 2018-03-01

Open Access

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Open Access

This item is open access.

Microsoft Word XML

Download Accepted Manuscript VersionMicrosoft Word XML (251.74 kB)

View on publisher's site

View statistics

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Katic, M https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9066-8036	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Agarwal, R https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-7313	en_US
dc.date.issued	2018-03-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2018, 19 pp. 69 - 86	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0972-2696	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/121915
dc.description.abstract	© 2018, Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management. The ability to simultaneously increase operational efficiency and undertake organisational innovation has become a cornerstone for the long-term prosperity of organisations. For manufacturing small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that produce a high variety of customised products at low volumes (HVLV), achieving this so-called organisational ambidexterity poses significant challenges. HVLV manufacturers are designed to facilitate maximum flexibility in the manufacturing system; however, it is this same flexibility that can hinder the ability of a HVLV manufacturer to achieve organisational ambidexterity—bringing to light an apparent trade-off between two seemingly contradictory objectives. Hence, in this paper, we investigate the relationship between flexibility and ambidexterity in the context of HVLV manufacturing as well as the use of different management practices to manage this relationship. We construct a conceptual model by adopting a paradox-based view of tensions using insights from an extensive literature review. Building off the contributions of paradox and organisation theory, this conceptual model demonstrates the multi-dimensional and dynamic nature of tensions between flexibility and ambidexterity as they manifest as much from salient factors (regarding social phenomena and individual cognition) as they are from latent factors (through the complex interactions of organisational elements). By moving beyond the dominant paradigm of efficiency-driven research in HVLV manufacturing, we provide managers with unique insights into the role flexibility plays in achieving ambidexterity to help facilitate better informed decisions taken by them. Further theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as potential areas for further research.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1007/s40171-018-0184-x	en_US
dc.title	The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	19	en_US
utslib.for	1503 Business and Management	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business/Management Discipline
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology
utslib.copyright.status	open_access
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	19	en_US

Abstract:

© 2018, Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management. The ability to simultaneously increase operational efficiency and undertake organisational innovation has become a cornerstone for the long-term prosperity of organisations. For manufacturing small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that produce a high variety of customised products at low volumes (HVLV), achieving this so-called organisational ambidexterity poses significant challenges. HVLV manufacturers are designed to facilitate maximum flexibility in the manufacturing system; however, it is this same flexibility that can hinder the ability of a HVLV manufacturer to achieve organisational ambidexterity—bringing to light an apparent trade-off between two seemingly contradictory objectives. Hence, in this paper, we investigate the relationship between flexibility and ambidexterity in the context of HVLV manufacturing as well as the use of different management practices to manage this relationship. We construct a conceptual model by adopting a paradox-based view of tensions using insights from an extensive literature review. Building off the contributions of paradox and organisation theory, this conceptual model demonstrates the multi-dimensional and dynamic nature of tensions between flexibility and ambidexterity as they manifest as much from salient factors (regarding social phenomena and individual cognition) as they are from latent factors (through the complex interactions of organisational elements). By moving beyond the dominant paradigm of efficiency-driven research in HVLV manufacturing, we provide managers with unique insights into the role flexibility plays in achieving ambidexterity to help facilitate better informed decisions taken by them. Further theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as potential areas for further research.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/121915