Contracts for the sale of land — When does a deposit paid via instalments constitute a penalty?

Publisher:
LexisNexis
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Citation:
Australian Property Law Journal, 2016, 25 pp. 40 - 54
Issue Date:
2016
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
Filename Description Size
Contracts_for_the_sale_of_land_—_When_does.pdfPublished Version93.81 kB
Adobe PDF
Tension has long existed between common law and equity over whether certain moneys sought as a result of a contractual breach should be constituted as a penalty. Recently, this ongoing debate has had significant consequences for parties in conveyancing matters where deposits are paid via instalments. Previous case law reveals some courts confirming the status of secondary payments as deposits, with others declaring them to be unenforceable penalties. Associate Justice Harrison’s recent judgment in Rana v Dalla Costa has to an extent clarified how the courts will determine the status of a deposit paid via instalments. In light of the decision, this article revisits the leading authorities and fundamental principles in an effort to elucidate the current standing of the law.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: