Design of MySuper default funds: influences and outcomes

Butt, A; Donald, MS; Foster, FD; Thorp, S; Warren, GJ

Design of MySuper default funds: influences and outcomes

Butt, A Donald, MS Foster, FD Thorp, S

Warren, GJ

Permalink

Publication Type:: Journal Article
Citation:: Accounting and Finance, 2017, 57 (1), pp. 47 - 85
Issue Date:: 2017-03-01

Closed Access

	Filename	Description	Size
	Butt_et_al-2017-Accounting_%26_Finance (1).pdf	Published Version	215.09 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Copyright Clearance Process

Recently Added
In Progress
Closed Access

This item is closed access and not available.

Full metadata record

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Butt, A	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Donald, MS	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Foster, FD	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Thorp, S https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-0876	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Warren, GJ	en_US
dc.date.issued	2017-03-01	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Accounting and Finance, 2017, 57 (1), pp. 47 - 85	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0810-5391	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10453/124137
dc.description.abstract	© 2015 AFAANZ We interview Australian fund executives about how their organisations responded to MySuper, a regulatory framework for default retirement savings funds that providers were required to have in place by the beginning of 2014. We provide an account of the influences on MySuper product design. Our analysis generates insight into how fund providers balanced their perceptions of the needs of default fund members against business considerations. Differences in member bases and organisational circumstances across funds are found to lead to considerable variation in default fund design.	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Accounting and Finance	en_US
dc.relation.isbasedon	10.1111/acfi.12134	en_US
dc.subject.classification	Accounting	en_US
dc.title	Design of MySuper default funds: influences and outcomes	en_US
dc.type	Journal Article
utslib.citation.volume	1	en_US
utslib.citation.volume	57	en_US
utslib.for	1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability	en_US
utslib.for	1502 Banking, Finance and Investment	en_US
utslib.for	1402 Applied Economics	en_US
pubs.embargo.period	Not known	en_US
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Faculty of Business
pubs.organisational-group	/University of Technology Sydney/Strength - CENSOC - Study of Choice
utslib.copyright.status	closed_access
pubs.issue	1	en_US
pubs.publication-status	Published	en_US
pubs.volume	57	en_US

Abstract:

© 2015 AFAANZ We interview Australian fund executives about how their organisations responded to MySuper, a regulatory framework for default retirement savings funds that providers were required to have in place by the beginning of 2014. We provide an account of the influences on MySuper product design. Our analysis generates insight into how fund providers balanced their perceptions of the needs of default fund members against business considerations. Differences in member bases and organisational circumstances across funds are found to lead to considerable variation in default fund design.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10453/124137