Fracture Risk Assessment: From Population to Individual
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Citation:
- Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2017, 20 (3), pp. 368 - 378
- Issue Date:
- 2017-07-01
Closed Access
| Filename | Description | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC-10017041.pdf | Published Version | 1.29 MB |
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Closed Access
This item is closed access and not available.
© 2017 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry Fracture caused by osteoporosis remains a major public health burden on contemporary populations because fracture is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of mortality. Early identification of high-risk individuals for prevention is a priority in osteoporosis research. Over the past decade, few risk prediction models, including the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator (Garvan) and FRAX®, have been developed to provide absolute (individualized) risk of fracture. Recent validation studies suggested that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in fracture discrimination ranged from 0.61 to 0.83 for FRAX® and from 0.63 to 0.88 for Garvan, with hip fractures having a better discrimination than fragility fractures as a group. Although the prognostic performance of Garvan and FRAX® for fracture prediction is not perfect and there is room for further improvement, these predictive models can aid patients and doctors communicate about fracture risk in the medium term and to make rational decisions. However, the application of these predictive models in making decisions for an individual should take into account the individual's perception of the importance of fracture relative to other diseases.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: