Associations between complementary medicine utilisation and the use of contraceptive methods: Results of a national cross-sectional survey
- Publication Type:
- Journal Article
- Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2018, 33 pp. 100 - 106
- Issue Date:
Files in This Item:
|Steel 2018 Associations CAM Contraception ALSWH.pdf||Published Version||210.23 kB|
Copyright Clearance Process
- Recently Added
- In Progress
- Open Access
This item is new to OPUS and is not currently available.
Background and purpose This study examines the relationship between the use of complementary medicine (CM) interventions or consultations with CM practitioners and women's choice of contraceptive method. Materials and methods A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of Australian Women aged 34–39 years from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) was conducted. Associations between use of CM and contraception were analysed using Chi-squared tests and multivariate logistic regression. Results Based on the responses from the included women (n = 7299), women who consulted a naturopath/herbalist were less likely to use implant contraceptives (OR 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33; 0.95). Those consulting a chiropractor (OR 1.54; 95%CI 1.05; 2.25) or an osteopath (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.32; 3.54) were more likely to use natural contraception. Conclusion There may be a link between women's choice of contraceptive method and their use of CM, in particular, with CM practitioner consultations.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: